Bug 20439 - Unmoveable objects should not be displayed as movable in UMC
Unmoveable objects should not be displayed as movable in UMC
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Product: UCS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: UMC - Domain management (Generic)
UCS 4.0
Other Linux
: P4 minor (vote)
: UCS 4.1
Assigned To: Florian Best
Felix Botner
: interim-2
: 25329 32534 33169 36688 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-10-19 15:29 CEST by Moritz Muehlenhoff
Modified: 2015-11-24 10:38 CET (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: ---
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional): Usability
Max CVSS v3 score:
best: Patch_Available+


Attachments
patch (2.39 KB, patch)
2015-07-10 09:10 CEST, Florian Best
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Moritz Muehlenhoff univentionstaff 2010-10-19 15:29:19 CEST
Z.Zt. kann man im UDM Richtlinien-Objekte in der Navigation zum "Verschieben" auswählen, wenn man dann aber an einer neue Position wechselt und auf "An diese Position verschieben" klickt, kommt eine Fehlermeldung, dass das Verschieben nicht erlaubt ist.

Wenn Richtlinien nicht verschoben werden können (wovon ich jetzt mal ausgehe), sollten sie auch im UDM nicht als verschiebbar angeboten werden.
Comment 1 Sönke Schwardt-Krummrich univentionstaff 2013-01-09 10:57:41 CET
Das ist einem Kunden mit UCS 3.0-2 wieder aufgefallen.
Comment 2 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2015-02-24 21:15:01 CET
This issue has been filed against UCS 2.3.

UCS 2.3 is out of maintenance and many UCS components have vastly changed in
later releases. Thus, this issue is now being closed.

If this issue still occurs in newer UCS versions, please use "Clone this bug".
In this case please provide detailed information on how this issue is affecting
you.
Comment 3 Alexander Kläser univentionstaff 2015-02-25 11:23:55 CET
Still applies to UCS 4.1.
Comment 4 Alexander Kläser univentionstaff 2015-02-25 11:24:21 CET
(In reply to Alexander Kläser from comment #3)
> Still applies to UCS 4.1.

I mean 4.0-1 :) .
Comment 5 Florian Best univentionstaff 2015-06-16 12:38:08 CEST
*** Bug 36688 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Florian Best univentionstaff 2015-07-10 09:10:36 CEST
Created attachment 7017 [details]
patch

It is really simple. The attached patch evaluates the operations 'move', 'remove' and 'edit'.
Comment 7 Florian Best univentionstaff 2015-07-14 10:05:02 CEST
*** Bug 25329 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Florian Best univentionstaff 2015-08-27 18:04:42 CEST
(In reply to Alexander Kläser from comment #3)
> Still applies to UCS 4.1.
I applied that patch for UCS 4.1 :)

univention-management-console-module-udm (6.0.3-1):
r63302 | Bug #20439: evaluate operations 'edit', 'move', 'remove' in the frontend
Comment 9 Alexander Kramer univentionstaff 2015-11-05 15:26:05 CET
OK - Bug #25329
OK - Bug #36688
OK - Unmoveable objects should not be displayed as movable
OK - Changelog xml
Comment 10 Florian Best univentionstaff 2015-11-10 16:40:41 CET
It's not possible to edit printer groups anymore as the handler doesn't define "operations".
Comment 11 Florian Best univentionstaff 2015-11-10 16:42:06 CET
Fixed in svn r65384.
Comment 12 Felix Botner univentionstaff 2015-11-10 16:50:09 CET
OK
Comment 13 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2015-11-17 12:12:41 CET
UCS 4.1 has been released:
 https://docs.software-univention.de/release-notes-4.1-0-en.html
 https://docs.software-univention.de/release-notes-4.1-0-de.html

If this error occurs again, please use "Clone This Bug".
Comment 14 Florian Best univentionstaff 2015-11-24 10:38:08 CET
*** Bug 32534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 Florian Best univentionstaff 2015-11-24 10:38:24 CET
*** Bug 33169 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***