Bug 29062 - Samba4-Test: Sysvol-Replikation
Samba4-Test: Sysvol-Replikation
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Product: UCS Test
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Samba
unspecified
Other Linux
: P5 normal (vote)
: UCS 3.1
Assigned To: Tobias Peters
Arvid Requate
: interim-5
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-11-05 18:08 CET by Tobias Peters
Modified: 2023-03-25 06:54 CET (History)
0 users

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: ---
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tobias Peters univentionstaff 2012-11-05 18:08:59 CET
Es soll geprüft werden ob GPOs die auf einem DC erstellt wurden auch auf einen anderen repliziert werden.
Comment 1 Tobias Peters univentionstaff 2012-11-07 18:34:22 CET
Der Test wurde als 51_samba4/50replication_drs hinzugefügt.
Comment 2 Tobias Peters univentionstaff 2012-11-29 13:12:52 CET
Der Name des Tests lautet: 52replication_sysvol
Comment 3 Arvid Requate univentionstaff 2013-06-25 14:43:53 CEST
If possible the fACLs schould be compared after the sync.
Comment 4 Arvid Requate univentionstaff 2013-06-26 18:37:36 CEST
I also activated the tests for backup ans slave. changelog added.
Comment 5 Arvid Requate univentionstaff 2013-07-02 18:36:21 CEST
The test was still flaky, I adjusted it so that the GPO is always created on the remote host and then we wait for replication. samba-tool gpo create otherwise picked a random DC.
Comment 6 Tobias Peters univentionstaff 2013-07-16 14:04:51 CEST
It works that the GPO is always created on the remote host and the test is canceled if no other samba4 host can be found.
Comment 7 Arvid Requate univentionstaff 2013-08-27 13:37:44 CEST
Ok, the tests work, I rebuilt the package with minor code cleanups in 52replication_sysvol. 50replication_drs is too trivial at the moment, let's see.