Bug 38749 – Password-/Account lockout-Policies can't be used

Bug 38749 - Password-/Account lockout-Policies can't be used


Summary:	Password-/Account lockout-Policies can't be used

Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX

Product:	UCS manual
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	User management
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	UCS 4.1-x
Assigned To:	Docu maintainers
QA Contact:	UMC maintainers

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:	38748
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2015-06-23 10:50 CEST by Janis Meybohm
Modified:	2024-04-17 13:16 CEST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:	2015081421000357
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Janis Meybohm

2015-06-23 10:50:49 CEST

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #38748 +++

As Bug #38748 will probably not get fixed anytime soon we should add a clean statement to the manual that Password-/Account lockout-Policies are not supported with UCS AD.

We should add that to the list of restrictions in:
* http://docs.univention.de/manual-4.0.html#windows:general

As well as a note in:
* http://docs.univention.de/manual-4.0.html#gpo:intro

And:
* http://docs.univention.de/manual-4.0.html#users:password:samba

Comment 1 Arvid Requate

2015-06-23 14:23:13 CEST

As far as I see Samba DCs currently also don't evaluate the Fine-Grained Password Policies (PSO).

Comment 2 Janis Meybohm

2015-08-20 09:54:24 CEST

Ticket#2015081421000357

Comment 3 Nico Gulden

2024-04-17 13:16:15 CEST

This bug hasn't seen any update for several years. I close it.

If you still see a need for it, you can reopen the bug. Please add an argumentation about why it's important to take care of it.