Bug 24661 - PTR-Record-Objekttyp sollte "Pointer Record" heissen, nicht "Pointer"
PTR-Record-Objekttyp sollte "Pointer Record" heissen, nicht "Pointer"
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Product: UCS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: UMC - DNS
UCS 3.0
Other Linux
: P5 minor (vote)
: UCS 3.2
Assigned To: Lukas Walter
Florian Best
: interim-1
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-11-16 12:25 CET by Moritz Muehlenhoff
Modified: 2013-11-19 06:43 CET (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: ---
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional): Typo/text changes
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Moritz Muehlenhoff univentionstaff 2011-11-16 12:25:30 CET
Alle anderen Records heissen "Host Record", "Alias Record" etc., bis auf den Objekttyp für PTR-Records, der heisst einfach nur "Pointer". Hier sollte aus Konsistenzgründen ebenfalls "Pointer Record" verwendet werden.
Comment 1 Lukas Walter univentionstaff 2013-07-09 13:13:47 CEST
Die Modulbeschreibung sowie die im Modul enthaltene Eigenschaft "Pointer" wurden in "Pointer record" abgeändert.
Comment 2 Florian Best univentionstaff 2013-07-26 12:27:32 CEST
Changes de + en OK

Changelog OK (after converting to docbook format)
Comment 3 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2013-11-19 06:43:04 CET
UCS 3.2 has been released:
 http://docs.univention.de/release-notes-3.2-en.html
 http://docs.univention.de/release-notes-3.2-de.html

If this error occurs again, please use "Clone This Bug".