Bug 29229 – Samba4-Test: samba share rules

Bug 29229 - Samba4-Test: samba share rules


Summary:	Samba4-Test: samba share rules

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 29054

Product:	UCS Test
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Samba
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	UCS 3.1
Assigned To:	Tobias Peters
QA Contact:	Arvid Requate

URL:
Keywords:	interim-5

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-11-14 18:05 CET by Tobias Peters
Modified:	2023-03-25 06:52 CET (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Tobias Peters

2012-11-14 18:05:47 CET

Es soll getestet werden, ob die mit UDM auf einen smb-Share gesetzten samba share rules beim Zugriff mit smbclient korrekt wirken.

Comment 1 Tobias Peters

2012-11-14 18:38:14 CET

Der Test wurde hinzugefügt als 51_samba4/46file_access_permissions-samba_share_rules

Comment 2 Arvid Requate

2013-06-25 13:28:55 CEST

The current test is not really samba4 specific, maybe move to 53_samba-common? And maybe add some first order checks (e.g. for sambaWriteable) and maybe also a second order check like a black/white listing combination (+user&-group -> user should have access?). Just some more relevant stuff.

Comment 3 Tobias Peters

2013-07-08 12:32:44 CEST

(In reply to Arvid Requate from comment #2)
> The current test is not really samba4 specific, maybe move to
> 53_samba-common? And maybe add some first order checks (e.g. for
> sambaWriteable) and maybe also a second order check like a black/white
> listing combination (+user&-group -> user should have access?). Just some
> more relevant stuff.

The mentioned first order and second order checks have been added to the test. Additionally, the test has been moved to 53_samba-common.

Comment 4 Arvid Requate

2013-07-15 16:50:12 CEST

Code has been merged.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 29054 ***