Univention Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
Summary: | DNS synchronization broken if ldap/base and samba4/ldap/base are different | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | UCS | Reporter: | Felix Botner <botner> |
Component: | S4 Connector | Assignee: | Samba maintainers <samba-maintainers> |
Status: | NEEDMOREINFO --- | QA Contact: | Samba maintainers <samba-maintainers> |
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P5 | CC: | best, bremer, steuwer, stoeckigt |
Version: | UCS 4.4 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Other | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
What kind of report is it?: | Bug Report | What type of bug is this?: | 5: Major Usability: Impairs usability in key scenarios |
Who will be affected by this bug?: | 1: Will affect a very few installed domains | How will those affected feel about the bug?: | 3: A User would likely not purchase the product |
User Pain: | 0.086 | Enterprise Customer affected?: | |
School Customer affected?: | ISV affected?: | ||
Waiting Support: | Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review: | ||
Ticket number: | Bug group (optional): | ||
Max CVSS v3 score: |
Description
Felix Botner
2019-01-08 16:37:14 CET
This is a very uncommon scenario - the normal setup configures the same base for both. Is there a valid use case for this configuration? (In reply to Ingo Steuwer from comment #1) > This is a very uncommon scenario - the normal setup configures the same base > for both. > > Is there a valid use case for this configuration? At least the following: We have cases where customers have a ldap base like "l=foo,l=bar" and in Samba we always use "DC=foo,DC=bar" as ldap base. |