Bug 30334 - Manual layout improvements
Manual layout improvements
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: UCS manual
Classification: Unclassified
Component: General
unspecified
Other Linux
: P5 enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Docu maintainers
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-02-07 10:15 CET by Alexander Kläser
Modified: 2024-04-17 13:16 CEST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: ---
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional): Design
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexander Kläser univentionstaff 2013-02-07 10:15:25 CET
The following points have caught my eyes when working with the documentation:
* It would be nice to have a sans serif font in general (as in the old doc)
* The links to the sections are not colored (as in the old doc)
* The size of the chapter and section headlines seem to be a bit too large relatively to the font size of the standard text
Comment 1 Alexander Kläser univentionstaff 2013-02-07 10:26:20 CET
In okular, the sections in the TOC are not clickable in the PDF. Viewing it through the browser (pdf.js) is working.
Comment 2 Philipp Hahn univentionstaff 2013-02-07 16:01:02 CET
(In reply to comment #0)
> The following points have caught my eyes when working with the documentation:
> * It would be nice to have a sans serif font in general (as in the old doc)

That because ./webroot/univention.css defines
»···font: 12px Myriad,Helvetica,Tahoma,Arial,clean,sans-serif;
while the PDF version does not override any font settings and thus uses Times Roman.

> * The links to the sections are not colored (as in the old doc)

are you talking about the HTML oder PDF documentation?

(In reply to comment #1)
> In okular, the sections in the TOC are not clickable in the PDF. Viewing it
> through the browser (pdf.js) is working.

Are you talking about the main TOC or the chapter TOCs?
Both WORK FOR ME.

<http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-3.1%20Handbooks/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/webroot/>
Comment 3 Alexander Kläser univentionstaff 2013-05-28 19:56:57 CEST
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > The following points have caught my eyes when working with the documentation:
> > * It would be nice to have a sans serif font in general (as in the old doc)
> 
> That because ./webroot/univention.css defines
> »···font: 12px Myriad,Helvetica,Tahoma,Arial,clean,sans-serif;
> while the PDF version does not override any font settings and thus uses Times
> Roman.

For HTML it seems to be the same. The general text is sans serif, therefore the heading should be sans serif, as well. IMHO this really does not look very good.

> > * The links to the sections are not colored (as in the old doc)
> 
> are you talking about the HTML oder PDF documentation?

PDF.

> (In reply to comment #1)
> > In okular, the sections in the TOC are not clickable in the PDF. Viewing it
> > through the browser (pdf.js) is working.
> 
> Are you talking about the main TOC or the chapter TOCs?
> Both WORK FOR ME.
> 
> <http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-3.1%20Handbooks/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/webroot/>

No, I just compiled the UCS@school manual (which uses the same common sources).
Comment 4 Nico Gulden univentionstaff 2024-04-17 13:16:46 CEST
This bug hasn't seen any update for several years. I close it.

If you still see a need for it, you can reopen the bug. Please add an argumentation about why it's important to take care of it.