Bug 32377 - review quota implementation: shares vs. partitions
review quota implementation: shares vs. partitions
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Product: UCS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Quota
UCS 3.1
Other Linux
: P5 enhancement (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: UCS maintainers
:
: 6971 18898 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-08-26 15:45 CEST by Ingo Steuwer
Modified: 2017-08-08 07:09 CEST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: ---
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?: Yes
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional): Further conceptual development, Roadmap discussion (moved)
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ingo Steuwer univentionstaff 2013-08-26 15:45:42 CEST
The current implementations for filesystem quotas is inconsequent:

- in UDM, quota-policies are combined with shares
- in UMC, quotas are shown for partitions

Technically correct is the combination of quotas and partitions. For most administrators, it is easier to think about shares (or the "task" assigned to a share) instead of partitions. In UDM, only shares are available.

The integration of quotas and shares/partitions should be revised, possible approaches:
1. UMC only
- remove filesystem-quota-policies from UDM
- add the "default-quota"-functionalities into the UMC-modules
- add informations about the shares on a partition
Draback: no central management

2. better UDM integration
- add partitions to UDM (attribute at the share, standalone object, ...?)
- combine default quotas with partitions

3. ..?

Requested in connection with 2013081321058168
See also older requests from Bug #6971 and Bug #18898
Comment 1 Ingo Steuwer univentionstaff 2013-08-26 15:46:46 CEST
*** Bug 18898 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Ingo Steuwer univentionstaff 2013-08-26 15:46:57 CEST
*** Bug 6971 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2017-06-16 20:37:38 CEST
This issue has been filed against UCS 3. UCS 3 is out of the normal maintenance and many UCS components have vastly changed in UCS 4.

If this issue is still valid, please change the version to a newer UCS version otherwise this issue will be automatically closed in the next weeks.
Comment 4 Florian Best univentionstaff 2017-06-28 14:52:23 CEST
There is a Customer ID set so I set the flag "Enterprise Customer affected".
Comment 5 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2017-08-08 07:09:42 CEST
This issue has been filed against UCS 3.1.

UCS 3.1 is out of maintenance and many UCS components have vastly changed in later releases. Thus, this issue is now being closed.

If this issue still occurs in newer UCS versions, please use "Clone this bug" or reopen this issue. In this case please provide detailed information on how this issue is affecting you.