Bug 36896 – Failed UCS 4.0-0 test case: 66_udm-computers.16_all_roles_modification_set_network.test

Bug 36896 - Failed UCS 4.0-0 test case: 66_udm-computers.16_all_roles_modification_set_network.test


Summary:	Failed UCS 4.0-0 test case: 66_udm-computers.16_all_roles_modification_set_ne...

Status:	CLOSED FIXED

Product:	UCS Test
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	UDM
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Drees Dormann
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2014-11-20 08:38 CET by Stefan Gohmann
Modified:	2023-03-25 06:44 CET (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	Development Internal
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
ucs-test.log (3.05 MB, application/text) 2014-11-20 08:38 CET, Stefan Gohmann	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Stefan Gohmann

2014-11-20 08:38:42 CET

Created attachment 6443 [details]
ucs-test.log

The following UCS 4.0 test case failed in Jenkins:
 66_udm-computers.16_all_roles_modification_set_network.test

Attached you find the ucs-test log file.

Please check if it is a problem in the test case. If it is a test case problem, please fix it.

If it is a problem with UCS 4.0, please file a bug against UCS 4 and disable this test case until the bug has been fixed in UCS 4.0

http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.0/job/UCS-4.0-0/job/Autotest%20MultiEnv/67/SambaVersion=s4,Systemrolle=master/

Comment 1 Drees Dormann

2014-12-18 14:14:39 CET

problem is fixed but test has been disabled due to Bug 37365

Comment 2 Stefan Gohmann

2016-10-12 07:48:31 CEST

For this bug is no separate QA needed.