Bug 37401 – 10_ldap/80acl_unregistration_basis fails

Bug 37401 - 10_ldap/80acl_unregistration_basis fails


Summary:	10_ldap/80acl_unregistration_basis fails

Status:	CLOSED FIXED

Product:	UCS Test
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	LDAP
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Ammar Najjar
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2014-12-19 11:43 CET by Ammar Najjar
Modified:	2023-03-25 06:48 CET (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	Development Internal
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Ammar Najjar

2014-12-19 11:43:46 CET

10_ldap/80acl_unregistration_basis failed in the last two Jenkins runs #115 & #116 with the same failing message:

### FAIL ###
New user was able to modify cn=hdkytsjbjz,dc=autotest201,dc=local
###      ###

Test script looks a bit old, and might need a review, for example it is using sleep to wait for certain actions.
for this specific failing case, using wait_for_replication_and_postrun() instead of sleep(30) made the script passes.

Comment 1 Ammar Najjar

2015-01-05 09:30:21 CET

Script is updated and sleep statements are replaced with active functions (wait_for_ldap, wait_for_replication_and_postrun).

Comment 2 Philipp Hahn

2015-01-09 13:03:32 CET

Jenkins regression r57050: 10_ldap.80acl_unregistration_basis.test
> ### FAIL ###
> New user was able to modify cn=rthcfso0gq,dc=autotest093,dc=local

<http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.0/job/UCS-4.0-0/job/Autotest%20MultiEnv/lastCompletedBuild/SambaVersion=s4,Systemrolle=backup/testReport/10_ldap/80acl_unregistration_basis/test/>

Comment 3 Philipp Hahn

2015-01-09 13:16:54 CET

2nd Jenkins regression: <http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.0/job/UCS-4.0-0/job/Autotest%20MultiEnv/lastCompletedBuild/SambaVersion=s4,Systemrolle=member/testReport/10_ldap/80acl_unregistration_basis/test/>

> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "80acl_unregistration_basis", line 89, in <module>
>     main()
>   File "80acl_unregistration_basis", line 69, in main
>     wait_for_ldap()
>   File "/usr/share/ucs-test/10_ldap/ldap_extension_utils.py", line 51, in wait_for_ldap
>     print "(%s) process is running now.\n" % pinfo[0]
> IndexError: list index out of range

Comment 4 Ammar Najjar

2015-01-12 11:32:45 CET

(In reply to Philipp Hahn from comment #3)
> 2nd Jenkins regression:
> <http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.0/job/UCS-4.0-0/job/
> Autotest%20MultiEnv/lastCompletedBuild/SambaVersion=s4,Systemrolle=member/
> testReport/10_ldap/80acl_unregistration_basis/test/>
> 
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "80acl_unregistration_basis", line 89, in <module>
> >     main()
> >   File "80acl_unregistration_basis", line 69, in main
> >     wait_for_ldap()
> >   File "/usr/share/ucs-test/10_ldap/ldap_extension_utils.py", line 51, in wait_for_ldap
> >     print "(%s) process is running now.\n" % pinfo[0]
> > IndexError: list index out of range

Logical mistake solved.

Comment 5 Ammar Najjar

2015-01-12 11:38:55 CET

(In reply to Philipp Hahn from comment #2)
> Jenkins regression r57050: 10_ldap.80acl_unregistration_basis.test
> > ### FAIL ###
> > New user was able to modify cn=rthcfso0gq,dc=autotest093,dc=local
> 
> <http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.0/job/UCS-4.0-0/job/
> Autotest%20MultiEnv/lastCompletedBuild/SambaVersion=s4,Systemrolle=backup/
> testReport/10_ldap/80acl_unregistration_basis/test/>

Timing issue in ucs_unregisterLDAPExtension; time.sleep is added and Bug #37516 is created.

Comment 6 Stefan Gohmann

2016-10-12 07:48:41 CEST

For this bug is no separate QA needed.