Bug 37479 – Compare version numbers in 3.2-x-errata against 4.0-0

Bug 37479 - Compare version numbers in 3.2-x-errata against 4.0-0


Summary:	Compare version numbers in 3.2-x-errata against 4.0-0

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 36369

Product:	UCS Test
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Updater
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Dmitry Galkin
QA Contact:	Moritz Muehlenhoff

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2015-01-08 07:00 CET by Moritz Muehlenhoff
Modified:	2023-03-25 06:49 CET (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:	36369
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Moritz Muehlenhoff

2015-01-08 07:00:44 CET

We need to ensure that the version numbers in 3.2-x-errata are always lower than the version in 4.0-0. Also bumping the version in 4.0-x-errata isn't sufficient, since UCS updates occur consecutively; a UCS 3.2 system is firstly updated to 4.0-0 and then to either 4.0-0-errata oder 4.0-1. 

We need an automated test which compares the version number of all binary packages in UCS 3.2-x-errata against their counterpart in 4.0-0.

Comment 1 Dmitry Galkin

2015-01-19 10:46:32 CET

Actually, we have a test in 00_checks/30_compare_package_versions added with Bug #36369, which at the moment shows the following:

---------------------------------------------------------
  The following packages use a smaller package version:
---------------------------------------------------------

 Package: icedtea-6-jre-cacao
   ucs_component/3.2-4-errata: 6b33-1.13.5-2.74.201412171318
   ucs_4.0-0: 6b31-1.13.3-1.73.201406190130
  Source package: openjdk-6
 Package: openjdk-6-dbg
   ucs_component/3.2-4-errata: 6b33-1.13.5-2.74.201412171318
   ucs_4.0-0: 6b31-1.13.3-1.73.201406190130
  Source package: openjdk-6
 Package: openjdk-6-demo
   ucs_component/3.2-4-errata: 6b33-1.13.5-2.74.201412171318
   ucs_4.0-0: 6b31-1.13.3-1.73.201406190130
  Source package: openjdk-6
 Package: openjdk-6-doc
   ucs_component/3.2-4-errata: 6b33-1.13.5-2.74.201412171318
   ucs_4.0-0: 6b31-1.13.3-1.73.201406190130
  Source package: openjdk-6
 Package: openjdk-6-jdk
   ucs_component/3.2-4-errata: 6b33-1.13.5-2.74.201412171318
   ucs_4.0-0: 6b31-1.13.3-1.73.201406190130
  Source package: openjdk-6
 Package: openjdk-6-jre-zero
   ucs_component/3.2-4-errata: 6b33-1.13.5-2.74.201412171318
   ucs_4.0-0: 6b31-1.13.3-1.73.201406190130
  Source package: openjdk-6
 Package: openjdk-6-source
   ucs_component/3.2-4-errata: 6b33-1.13.5-2.74.201412171318
   ucs_4.0-0: 6b31-1.13.3-1.73.201406190130
  Source package: openjdk-6

Affected source packages:
  openjdk-6

Number of affected binary packages: 7
Number of affected source packages: 1


This test is tagged as a 'producttest', thus it is not run on daily basis (as discussed with Philipp and Stefan some time ago). I think it should run at least with every errata update.

Comment 2 Dmitry Galkin

2015-01-19 10:46:52 CET


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 36369 ***

Comment 3 Moritz Muehlenhoff

2015-02-10 09:42:20 CET

Ok