Bug 32668 - User should always (if possible) upload x86 and x64 printer drivers
User should always (if possible) upload x86 and x64 printer drivers
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 30597
Product: UCS manual
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Print services
unspecified
Other Linux
: P5 normal (vote)
: UCS 3.2
Assigned To: Docu maintainers
UCS maintainers
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-09-24 08:56 CEST by Janis Meybohm
Modified: 2018-04-14 13:34 CEST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: ---
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Janis Meybohm univentionstaff 2013-09-24 08:56:46 CEST
As mentioned in the Samba wiki it is important that the user uploads drivers for both architectures as it is not possible to "add" another architecture afterwards.

<https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_as_a_print_server#Uploading_printer_drivers_for_Point.27n.27Print_driver_installation>
If you have to provide a printer driver for x86 and x64 plattforms, you have to upload them from a x64 machine. A x86 client can only upload x86 drivers, while a x64 client can do both.
It's important, that if you want to provide printing support for multiple platforms on one printer, that you upload drivers for both, that have exactly the same driver name! Otherwise, the driver for the different platforms can't be associated.


If there is only x64 driver, an x86 will assume that one as x86 driver and fails (with some wired error message) during installation.
Comment 1 Janis Meybohm univentionstaff 2013-09-24 08:57:46 CEST
This has it support several times in the last couple of weeks so it would be nice to have this one in the next release.
Comment 2 Moritz Muehlenhoff univentionstaff 2013-09-24 09:11:17 CEST
Already planned for 3.2

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 30597 ***
Comment 3 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2013-09-30 20:52:42 CEST
OK
Comment 4 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2017-05-09 08:38:11 CEST
Close old verified docu issues.