Univention Bugzilla – Bug 52511
Display error message if portal server is not running instead if empty portal page
Last modified: 2021-05-10 12:21:42 CEST
Restarting univention-portal-server fixed the issue. The remaining question is: why this service was stopped?
I am setting the comment to private. It's better not to write customer URLs or names into the bug description. The pastebins at bepasty are removed at some time - please add it as attachment.
I think this is a duplicate of Bug #52518. We could use this bug for more precise error handling, e.g. a error message should be shown.
This would be number 5 of customers! And yes it sounds very simular.
(In reply to Florian Best from comment #3) > I think this is a duplicate of Bug #52518. > We could use this bug for more precise error handling, e.g. a error message > should be shown. I also think it's a duplicate. Any Veto to close it as duplicate?
(In reply to Ingo Steuwer from comment #6) > (In reply to Florian Best from comment #3) > > I think this is a duplicate of Bug #52518. > > We could use this bug for more precise error handling, e.g. a error message > > should be shown. > > I also think it's a duplicate. Any Veto to close it as duplicate? closed as duplicate - Florian (QA), do you agree? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 52158 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 52518 ***
(In reply to Ingo Steuwer from comment #6) > (In reply to Florian Best from comment #3) > > I think this is a duplicate of Bug #52518. > > We could use this bug for more precise error handling, e.g. a error message > > should be shown. > > I also think it's a duplicate. Any Veto to close it as duplicate? Veto. As described above: This bug should be used to improove the error handling.
(In reply to Florian Best from comment #9) > (In reply to Ingo Steuwer from comment #6) > > (In reply to Florian Best from comment #3) > > > I think this is a duplicate of Bug #52518. > > > We could use this bug for more precise error handling, e.g. a error message > > > should be shown. > > > > I also think it's a duplicate. Any Veto to close it as duplicate? > > Veto. > As described above: This bug should be used to improove the error handling. OK, with the new focus of the bug I reduce the user pain.