Bug 13580 – Lokale Share-Konfiguration per UCR

Bug 13580 - Lokale Share-Konfiguration per UCR


Summary:	Lokale Share-Konfiguration per UCR

Status:	CLOSED FIXED

Product:	UCS Test
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Samba
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	P4 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Stefan Gohmann
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:	12024 46975
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2009-03-03 08:59 CET by Stefan Gohmann
Modified:	2023-03-25 06:51 CET (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:	34215
What kind of report is it?:	Development Internal
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Testskript für diesen Bug (2.21 KB, application/octet-stream) 2011-04-21 12:32 CEST, Arne Boockmeyer	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Stefan Gohmann

2009-03-03 08:59:40 CET

Dazu sollte es Testskripte geben.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #12024 +++

Die Konfiguration von Samba und Samba-Shares soll per UCR für rein lokale Einstellungen möglich sein. Dazu wird ein zusätzliches Paket implementieriert.

Die genaue Umsetzung ist im Reservierungssystem-Konzept beschrieben.

Comment 1 Arne Boockmeyer 2011-04-21 12:32:23 CEST

Created attachment 3222 [details]
Testskript für diesen Bug

Dieses Testskript testet ob es möglich ist, mit UCR Variablen Sambaeinstellungen zu bearbeiten. Ich hatte unter "ucs-test/scripts-03_ucr" lokal eingebunden.

Comment 2 Stefan Gohmann

2016-02-25 12:15:04 CET

I've added a simple test script: r67683

It is currently disabled due to Bug #34215.

Comment 3 Stefan Gohmann

2016-10-12 07:48:44 CEST

For this bug is no separate QA needed.