Bug 16047 – univention-kolab2 (maintained) depends on unmaintained packages

Bug 16047 - univention-kolab2 (maintained) depends on unmaintained packages


Summary:	univention-kolab2 (maintained) depends on unmaintained packages

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 14610

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Kolab
Version:	UCS 2.2
Hardware:	amd64 Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Bugzilla Mailingliste
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2009-10-21 12:42 CEST by Benjamin Kix
Modified:	2009-10-21 15:29 CEST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Benjamin Kix 2009-10-21 12:42:43 CEST

Hi,

the update of our UGS 2.2-2 installation showed up a problem with the package "univention-kolab2".

The package has a dependency on "univention-kolab2-tools" witch depends on "python-univention-kolab2". Both packages are only available in the unmaintained set.

So, if you don't have configured the unmaintained set of packages in your apt-scenario you run into a message like 

--->
Die folgenden Pakete haben nichterfüllte Abhängigkeiten:
  univention-kolab2: Hängt ab: univention-kolab2-tools ist aber nicht installierbar
<---

I think it's a bad idea to depend on unmaintained packes in a maintained one.. at last in such a crucial one.

Best Regards
Benjamin

Comment 1 Stefan Gohmann

2009-10-21 15:29:54 CEST

(In reply to comment #0)
> 
> I think it's a bad idea to depend on unmaintained packes in a maintained one..
> at last in such a crucial one.

Yes, we will fix it with UCS 2.3.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 14610 ***