Univention Bugzilla – Bug 22204
Faxnummer lässt sich nicht löschen
Last modified: 2011-04-14 11:45:17 CEST
Wenn versucht wird den letzten Wert am Multivalue Extended Attribute Faxnummer zu löschen, dann wird folgender Traceback ausgegeben: # udm users/user modify --dn uid=hans,cn=users,ou=filiale,dc=kunde,dc=local --remove 'Faxnummer=+49 123 456 88888888' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/univention-directory-manager-tools/univention-cli-server", line 231, in doit output = univention.admincli.admin.doit(arglist) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/univention/admincli/admin.py", line 907, in doit dn=object.modify() File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/univention/admin/handlers/__init__.py", line 317, in modify return self._modify(modify_childs,ignore_license=ignore_license) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/univention/admin/handlers/__init__.py", line 798, in _modify self.lo.modify(self.dn, ml, ignore_license=ignore_license) File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/univention/admin/uldap.py", line 357, in modify raise univention.admin.uexceptions.ldapError, msg[0]['desc'] ldapError: Inappropriate matching Definition des Extended Attribute Faxnummer: dn: cn=Faxnummer,cn=custom attributes,cn=univention,dc=kunde,dc=local univentionUDMPropertyValueMayChange: 1 univentionUDMPropertyDoNotSearch: 0 cn: Faxnummer univentionUDMPropertyShortDescription: Faxnummer objectClass: top objectClass: univentionUDMProperty univentionUDMPropertyModule: users/user univentionUDMPropertyModule: groups/group univentionUDMPropertyMultivalue: 1 univentionUDMPropertyVersion: 2 univentionUDMPropertyLayoutTabAdvanced: 0 univentionUDMPropertyLdapMapping: facsimileTelephoneNumber univentionUDMPropertyCLIName: Faxnummer univentionUDMPropertyValueRequired: 0 univentionUDMPropertyLayoutOverwritePosition: 0 univentionUDMPropertyLayoutOverwriteTab: 0 univentionUDMPropertyLayoutPosition: 10 univentionUDMPropertyLayoutTabName: Faxnummer univentionUDMPropertyObjectClass: organizationalPerson univentionUDMPropertyDeleteObjectClass: 0
Duplikat von bug14235 ?
Ja, das ist ein Duplikat. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 14235 ***