Bug 28692 – Make mailAlternativeAddress available for group objects

Bug 28692 - Make mailAlternativeAddress available for group objects


Summary:	Make mailAlternativeAddress available for group objects

Status:	REOPENED

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Mail
Version:	UCS 5.0
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P3 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Mail maintainers
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Duplicates:	48411 (view as bug list)
Depends on:	27871
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-10-04 11:48 CEST by Felix Botner
Modified:	2021-05-03 21:23 CEST (History)
CC List:	9 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	Feature Request
What type of bug is this?:	2: Improvement: Would be a product improvement
Who will be affected by this bug?:	1: Will affect a very few installed domains
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	2: A Pain – users won’t like this once they notice it
User Pain:	0.023
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Felix Botner

2012-10-04 11:48:26 CEST

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #27871 +++

<http://forum.univention.de/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=1882>

Es gab bereits einige Anfragen zu alternativen Mailadressen an Gruppen. Derzeit
gibt unser Schema das nicht her:

(In reply to comment #0 bug11254)
> > für das Abbilden alternativer Mailadressen an Gruppen kann das
> > mailAlternativeAddress Attribut nicht werwendet werden. Dies ist Teil der
> > Objektklasse univentionMail welche das Attribut "uid" Voraussetzt.
> > Sie sollten daher ein eigenes Attribut in einer Schema-Datei definieren und
> > dieses verwenden.
> > ...

Ich denke es wäre gut das in einem ersten Schritt entsprechend anzupassen
sodass Integrationen wie OX und Zarafa das verwenden können. Ggf. will man dass
dann auch in den Standard UCS Mailstack integrieren.


Das Schema wurde angepasst. Damit man das in UCS direkt verwenden kann, müsste noch das UDM Modul, UMC und das Mail-LDAP mapping angepasst werden.

Comment 1 Sönke Schwardt-Krummrich

2015-06-05 10:51:15 CEST

This has been requested again via
http://forum.univention.de/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4057&p=14792

Currently the LDAP scheme support mailAlternativeAddress at LDAP objects of type univentionGroup, but the attribute is not respected by postfix.

univention-mail-postfix/conffiles/etc/postfix/ldap.groups.d/10_base currently uses the following LDAP filter:

query_filter = (&(mailPrimaryAddress=%s)(objectclass=posixGroup))

It may be sufficient to change it to

query_filter = \
 (&(objectclass=posixGroup)(|(mailPrimaryAddress=%s)(mailAlternativeAddress=%s)))

Comment 2 Jens Thorp-Hansen

2015-06-29 08:31:17 CEST

Has been requested again at: http://forum.univention.de/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4057&p=14895#p14895

> man sollte den BUG auch um mailAlternativeAddress für Mail-Verteilerlisten 
> (Domain -> Mail) erweitern oder externe Ziel-Mailadressen für Mail-Gruppen 
> implementieren um alle Anwendungsfälle abzudecken. Aktuell sind in Mailgruppen
> nur interne Mail-User als Mitglieder zulässig. Hier könnte man ev. mit den 
> kürzlich ausgegliederten Zarafa Kontakten arbeiten.

Comment 3 Erik Damrose

2015-11-23 15:09:48 CET

Requested again: http://forum.univention.de/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=4195&p=16477#p16477

Comment 4 Stefan Gohmann

2019-01-03 07:22:26 CET

This issue has been filled against UCS 4.1. The maintenance with bug and security fixes for UCS 4.1 has ended on 5st of April 2018.

Customers still on UCS 4.1 are encouraged to update to UCS 4.3. Please contact
your partner or Univention for any questions.

If this issue still occurs in newer UCS versions, please use "Clone this bug" or simply reopen the issue. In this case please provide detailed information on how this issue is affecting you.

Comment 5 Daniel Tröder

2019-01-04 12:08:18 CET

Regularly requested by customers.

Comment 6 Florian Best

2021-05-03 21:23:38 CEST

*** Bug 48411 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***