Bug 28703 – ppolicy Schema einbinden

Bug 28703 - ppolicy Schema einbinden


Summary:	ppolicy Schema einbinden

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 31907

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	LDAP
Version:	UCS 3.0
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	UCS maintainers
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2012-10-08 11:05 CEST by Tim Petersen
Modified:	2018-04-14 13:44 CEST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Tim Petersen

2012-10-08 11:05:30 CEST

Angefragt im Forum an Ticket #2012100121004324:
"PS: Wäre es vl möglich, das ppolicy zukünftig zu implementieren, um sagen zu können, dass zB. nach 10 Fehllogins gegen das LDAP der Account für zB. 30 Minuten gesperrt wird???"

Es geht hierbei um "include /etc/ldap/schema/ppolicy.schema"

Comment 1 Arvid Requate

2014-11-20 17:59:52 CET

This lockout on faild LDAP bind attempts has been implemented in UCS 4.0 by loading and configuring ppolicy accordingly, see http://sdb.univention.de/1291 (Bug 31907).

Note that the feature of automatic (timed) unlocking has not been implemented yet, as it would either require quite a bit of coordinated modifications to the different authentication services (Samba, UMC, LDAP) to make them all aware of each others specific attributes -- or alternatively it would require a cron job. The discurraging point currently is the number of different attributes and attribute semantics that each of these authentication services use. We probably want to tackle this first in a future release. Some initial thoughts about this have been proposed at Bug 35809.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 31907 ***