Bug 31759 – Restrict visibility of certain udm attributes/modules to the existence of domain services

Bug 31759 - Restrict visibility of certain udm attributes/modules to the existence of domain services


Summary:	Restrict visibility of certain udm attributes/modules to the existence of dom...

Status:	REOPENED

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	UMC - Domain management (Generic)
Version:	UCS 5.0
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	UMC maintainers
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:	31760
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2013-06-18 15:26 CEST by Felix Botner
Modified:	2022-06-30 14:46 CEST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Felix Botner

2013-06-18 15:26:15 CEST

We need a way to "hide" UDM attributes (e.g. setQuota) or modules (e.g. policies/print_quota.py) if a special  domain service is not registered (e.g. PrintQuota)

Comment 1 Alexander Kläser

2013-06-25 18:16:09 CEST

Would it not be more appropriate to ship extended attributes along with software packages containing additional services than finding a way to hide existing (but not usable) properties?

Comment 2 Felix Botner

2013-06-26 10:43:11 CEST

(In reply to Alexander Kläser from comment #1)
> Would it not be more appropriate to ship extended attributes along with
> software packages containing additional services than finding a way to hide
> existing (but not usable) properties?

Yes, that would be the "right way", but we need something "simple", something that does not require the restructuring of multiple packages, new join scripts, modification of udm modules and so on and so forth

I think the effort (implementation, testing) to modify the existing udm modules according to the "right way" is too big.

Also, it is totally sufficient to be able to hide things in the UMC (not in the UDM)

Comment 3 Stefan Gohmann

2017-06-16 20:38:08 CEST

This issue has been filed against UCS 3. UCS 3 is out of the normal maintenance and many UCS components have vastly changed in UCS 4.

If this issue is still valid, please change the version to a newer UCS version otherwise this issue will be automatically closed in the next weeks.

Comment 4 Stefan Gohmann

2017-08-08 07:09:27 CEST

This issue has been filed against UCS 3.1.

UCS 3.1 is out of maintenance and many UCS components have vastly changed in later releases. Thus, this issue is now being closed.

If this issue still occurs in newer UCS versions, please use "Clone this bug" or reopen this issue. In this case please provide detailed information on how this issue is affecting you.