Bug 33430 – pTRRecord not indexed

Bug 33430 - pTRRecord not indexed


Summary:	pTRRecord not indexed

Status:	CLOSED FIXED

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	LDAP
Version:	UCS 3.2
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	UCS 3.2-0-errata
Assigned To:	Arvid Requate
QA Contact:	Janek Walkenhorst

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2013-11-15 16:57 CET by Erik Damrose
Modified:	2014-01-29 11:19 CET (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Erik Damrose

2013-11-15 16:57:37 CET

Despite being present univention-ldap-server.postinst, pTRRecord is logged as not indexed:

Nov 15 16:40:59 backup slapd[17609]: conn=1098 op=23 SRCH base="cn=shares,dc=ucsqapt,dc=local" scope=1 deref=0 filter="(&(objectClass=dNSZone)(!(relativeDomainName=@))(|(zoneName=*.in-addr.arpa)(zoneName=*.ip6.arpa))(|(pTRRecord=l*)(relativeDomainName=l*)))"
Nov 15 16:40:59 backup slapd[17609]: <= bdb_substring_candidates: (pTRRecord) not indexed

Attributes were tested by using Felix' script from Bug 29509#c7

Comment 1 Arvid Requate

2013-12-19 15:22:29 CET

There were a few possible index type combinations missing. As a consequence, some attributes where not indexed for all search types they were configured for by UCR. This affected the following attributes:

* name (now also indexed for presence)
* pTRRecord and sambaSID (now also indexed for substring)

Advisory: 2013-12-19-univention-ldap.yaml

Comment 2 Janek Walkenhorst

2014-01-24 17:39:03 CET

(In reply to Arvid Requate from comment #1)
> There were a few possible index type combinations missing. As a consequence,
> some attributes where not indexed for all search types they were configured
> for by UCR.
All index combinations are now correctly configured.

Advisory: OK

Comment 3 Moritz Muehlenhoff

2014-01-29 11:19:03 CET

http://errata.univention.de/ucs/3.2/37.html