Bug 34040 – LDAP_Search-Syntax: Filter nach Superordinate

Bug 34040 - LDAP_Search-Syntax: Filter nach Superordinate


Summary:	LDAP_Search-Syntax: Filter nach Superordinate

Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	UDM (Generic)
Version:	UCS 4.1
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	P5 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	UMC maintainers
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2014-02-03 15:20 CET by Tristan Bruns
Modified:	2018-04-13 13:28 CEST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:	38762
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Tristan Bruns 2014-02-03 15:20:44 CET

Unser Produkt verwendet im UDM die Superordinate/Child-Relationen und die LDAP_Search-Syntax. Wir würden gerne die Möglichkeit haben, die Auswahlliste der LDAP_Search-Syntax auf Objekte einzugrenzen, die zum gleichen Superordinate-Objekt gehören. Also, z.B.:

Bei folgender LDAP-Hierachie:
A: Asterisk-Server (Superordinate)
* B: Telefon (Child)
* C: Telefongruppe (Child)
D: Asterisk-Server (Superordinate)
* E: Telefon (Child)

Eine LDAP_Search in Objekt C nach Telefonen sollte dann nur Objekt B zurückgeben, nicht aber Objekt E.

Comment 1 Stefan Gohmann

2014-02-18 21:29:32 CET

This issue has been filed against the UCS version "unstable" which does not really exist. Please change the version value.

Comment 2 Alexander Kläser

2014-02-19 10:46:23 CET

Applies also to UCS 3.2.

Comment 3 Stefan Gohmann

2014-02-27 14:48:07 CET

LDAP_Search Syntax ist dafür nicht konzeptioniert. Besser eine separate Syntax Definition verwenden.

Comment 4 Florian Best

2017-01-25 15:00:24 CET

There is a link to this bugzilla entry in their product:

https://github.com/decoit/asterisk4ucs/blob/ucs4.1/asterisk4ucs-udm/modules/univention/admin/handlers/asterisk/server.py#L46