Bug 34325 – Document the minimal privileges of the synchronization user on the Windows AD server

Bug 34325 - Document the minimal privileges of the synchronization user on the Windows AD server


Summary:	Document the minimal privileges of the synchronization user on the Windows AD...

Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX

Product:	UCS manual
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Services for Windows
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Docu maintainers
QA Contact:	Samba maintainers

URL:	http://docs.univention.de/handbuch-3....
Keywords:

Depends on:	30987
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2014-03-12 14:34 CET by Stefan Gohmann
Modified:	2024-04-17 13:16 CEST (History)
CC List:	5 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Stefan Gohmann

2014-03-12 14:34:02 CET

> The section has changed due to other changes in the manual. This is now in
> 9.5.2.1
> 
> German version:
> Der Replikationsbenutzer muss im Active Directory Mitglied der Gruppe
> <emphasis>Domänen-Admins</emphasis> sein. Synchronisiert der Connector nur
> lesend von Active Directory zu UCS, kann auch ein Standardbenutzerkonto
> angegeben werden.

That is not right. The password service needs more rights even in read mode.

I think we should carefully re-check the old documentation, see Bug #30987.
 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #30987 +++

Comment 1 Stefan Gohmann

2015-03-06 07:30:04 CET

Remove this issue from the errata list. It has not been requested again.

Comment 2 Ingo Steuwer

2015-03-06 13:27:00 CET

This is requested, not often but regurlarly; last one I noticed is 2014103021000207

Comment 3 Nico Gulden

2024-04-17 13:16:15 CEST

This bug hasn't seen any update for several years. I close it.

If you still see a need for it, you can reopen the bug. Please add an argumentation about why it's important to take care of it.