Bug 35480 – Don't replicate old memberof attributes

Bug 35480 - Don't replicate old memberof attributes


Summary:	Don't replicate old memberof attributes

Status:	CLOSED FIXED

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Listener (univention-directory-listener)
Version:	UCS 3.2
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	UCS 3.2-3-errata
Assigned To:	Arvid Requate
QA Contact:	Felix Botner

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2014-07-28 09:03 CEST by Tim Petersen
Modified:	2014-09-10 17:43 CEST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Tim Petersen

2014-07-28 09:03:51 CEST

Ticket #2014071521000386

If memberof-overlay is disabled, the existing memberOf Attribute turns to an undefined attribute "MEMBEROF" which is findable as meta info (ldapsearch +).

The replication handler uses "*" and "+" as search filter, thus the join of (new) systems fails with an failed.ldif.

You could either:
1. Clean up ldap (remove MEMBEROF)
2. Don't replicate the attribute "MEMBEROF" in replication handler

Comment 1 Arvid Requate

2014-09-04 17:26:02 CEST

Fixed, Advisory: 2014-09-04-univention-directory-replication.yaml

Comment 2 Felix Botner

2014-09-05 12:35:57 CEST

Why not add "MEMBEROF" to the EXCLUDE_ATTRIBUTES list?

Comment 3 Arvid Requate

2014-09-08 11:31:33 CEST

Yes, that's better, adjusted and rebuilt.

Comment 4 Felix Botner

2014-09-08 12:19:58 CEST

OK - slave join with MEMBEROF
OK - 4.0
OK - YAML

Comment 5 Janek Walkenhorst

2014-09-10 17:43:09 CEST

http://errata.univention.de/ucs/3.2/200.html