Bug 36895 - Failed UCS 4.0-0 test case: 60_umc.06_non-ucr-policies.test
Summary: Failed UCS 4.0-0 test case: 60_umc.06_non-ucr-policies.test
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: UCS Test
Classification: Unclassified
Component: UMC
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other Linux
: P5 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dmitry Galkin
QA Contact:
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-11-20 08:38 CET by Stefan Gohmann
Modified: 2023-03-25 06:47 CET (History)
0 users

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: Development Internal
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Customer ID:
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments
ucs-test.log (3.05 MB, application/text)
2014-11-20 08:38 CET, Stefan Gohmann
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2014-11-20 08:38:23 CET
Created attachment 6442 [details]
ucs-test.log

The following UCS 4.0 test case failed in Jenkins:
 60_umc.06_non-ucr-policies.test

Attached you find the ucs-test log file.

Please check if it is a problem in the test case. If it is a test case problem, please fix it.

If it is a problem with UCS 4.0, please file a bug against UCS 4 and disable this test case until the bug has been fixed in UCS 4.0

http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.0/job/UCS-4.0-0/job/Autotest%20MultiEnv/67/SambaVersion=s4,Systemrolle=master/
Comment 1 Dmitry Galkin univentionstaff 2014-11-21 16:47:17 CET
r56062 :
  * 00_base/90change_user_pwd_via_udm,
    60_umc-system/31_umc-service-user-authentication,
    60_umc-system/30_umc-service-user-modules,
    60_umc/04_policies,
    60_umc/06_non-ucr-policies:
    when modifying a 'policy-reference' via udm - pass it with an underscore
    instead of dash (Bug #36893, #36894, #36895, #36900, #36901).

Some details about changes are in Bug #36893
Comment 2 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2016-10-12 07:48:43 CEST
For this bug is no separate QA needed.