Bug 39080 - bind9 rndc reload doesn't properly reload Samba4 DNS zones
bind9 rndc reload doesn't properly reload Samba4 DNS zones
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 39139
Product: UCS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Samba4
UCS 4.0
Other Linux
: P5 normal (vote)
: UCS 4.0-3-errata
Assigned To: Arvid Requate
Stefan Gohmann
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2015-08-04 17:24 CEST by Arvid Requate
Modified: 2015-09-02 13:00 CEST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: ---
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional): Troubleshooting
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments
syslog (7.38 KB, text/plain)
2015-08-04 17:25 CEST, Arvid Requate
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Arvid Requate univentionstaff 2015-08-04 17:24:38 CEST
bind9 rndc reload doesn't properly reload Samba4 DNS zones. The dns_bind9 module (or maybe our patch for it) ignores zones that it already has seen before. I think it needs adjustment.

Since the bind9 listener module uses rndc reload, it would be good to fix this. I don't know of any critical issue that might arise from this currently.


This is the characteristic part of the syslog message:
==============================================================
Aug  4 17:12:35 unassigned-hostname named[12266]: received control channel command 'reload'
[...]
Aug  4 17:12:35 unassigned-hostname named[12266]: samba_dlz: Ignoring duplicate zone            'arucs31ad1.qa' from 'DC=@,DC=arucs31ad1.qa,CN=MicrosoftDNS,CN=System,DC=arucs31ad1,DC=qa'
==============================================================
Comment 1 Arvid Requate univentionstaff 2015-08-04 17:25:02 CEST
Created attachment 7083 [details]
syslog
Comment 2 Arvid Requate univentionstaff 2015-08-11 21:57:09 CEST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39139 ***
Comment 3 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2015-08-27 15:07:26 CEST
(In reply to Arvid Requate from comment #2)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39139 ***

OK