Bug 40556 - Improve fail-safe domain setup
Improve fail-safe domain setup
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Product: UCS Test
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LDAP
unspecified
Other Linux
: P5 normal (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel Tröder
Stefan Gohmann
:
Depends on: 38091
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2016-02-02 05:51 CET by Stefan Gohmann
Modified: 2023-03-25 06:41 CET (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: ---
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2016-02-02 05:51:27 CET
We should add a test case for the setup code.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #38091 +++

We should check if we can implement a better default setup out-of-the-box.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #38090 +++

We have already different hints in the documentation about the domain setup and how to configure multiple LDAP servers, for example:
 http://docs.univention.de/manual-4.0.html#computers:configureldapserver

Nevertheless, we should add a single SDB entry which describes what to do to get a fail-safe setup, for example:

- DNS setup (UCR variable nameserver*)
- LDAP server (LDAP Server Policy)
- Kerberos KDC (dns query)
- Samba DCs (Installation of multiple DCs)

The manual should link to the article.
Comment 1 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2016-02-02 05:54:18 CET
I've split the test case from the original bug because we don't need to wait for the erratum.

Currently, the test fails:
http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.1/job/UCS-4.1-0/job/Autotest%20MultiEnv/SambaVersion=s4,Systemrolle=backup/195/testReport/junit/10_ldap/100_ldapserver_policy/test/
Comment 2 Daniel Tröder univentionstaff 2016-02-02 10:36:57 CET
Fixed with r67121.
Changelog and commit message used Bug #38091.
Comment 3 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2016-02-23 12:03:55 CET
OK, looks good now.