Bug 45113 – ini file DockerScriptInit is called Entrypoint

Bug 45113 - ini file DockerScriptInit is called Entrypoint


Summary:	ini file DockerScriptInit is called Entrypoint

Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 42970

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	App Center - Self Service
Version:	UCS 4.2
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	App Center maintainers
QA Contact:	Felix Botner

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2017-08-01 14:23 CEST by Felix Botner
Modified:	2023-03-25 06:40 CET (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	Feature Request
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Felix Botner

2017-08-01 14:23:16 CEST

In the Provider Portal there is a setting "Entrypoint for the Docker App" which is DockerScriptInit in the ini file. But this is not the entrypoint but the docker-create COMMAND. And the default is 'init'.

This is all very confusing.

(1) fix the Provider Portal description for DockerScriptInit

(2) We should think about getting rid of the default. Normally, docker images have a entrypoint and a Cmd in the image settings. And docker-create/run would use these settings. But we use a default CMD, which is incorrect for all docker apps except appbox. So every ISV has to define CMD in the Image and in the App ini file.

Comment 1 Stefan Gohmann

2018-06-25 07:22:02 CEST

I think it is a duplicate of Bug #42970.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 42970 ***

Comment 2 Felix Botner

2018-06-29 14:27:36 CEST

(In reply to Stefan Gohmann from comment #1)
> I think it is a duplicate of Bug #42970.
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 42970 ***

yes