Bug 49581 - NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_ALREADY_ASSOCIATED - samba startup failed during setup
Summary: NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_ALREADY_ASSOCIATED - samba startup failed during setup
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: UCS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Samba4
Version: UCS 4.4
Hardware: Other Linux
: P5 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Samba maintainers
QA Contact: Samba maintainers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-05-31 12:22 CEST by Felix Botner
Modified: 2025-02-05 09:28 CET (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: Development Internal
What type of bug is this?: 6: Setup Problem: Issue for the setup process
Who will be affected by this bug?: 1: Will affect a very few installed domains
How will those affected feel about the bug?: 5: Blocking further progress on the daily work
User Pain: 0.171
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Customer ID:
Max CVSS v3 score:


Attachments
log.samba (5.03 KB, text/plain)
2019-05-31 12:26 CEST, Felix Botner
Details
autotest.log (968.19 KB, text/x-log)
2019-05-31 12:27 CEST, Felix Botner
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Felix Botner univentionstaff 2019-05-31 12:22:31 CEST
Recently seen in our jenkins tests. 

Samba startup failed with 

[2019/05/30 23:54:18.852551,  0, pid=8495] ../../source4/smbd/service_stream.c:374(stream_setup_socket)
  stream_setup_socket: Failed to listen on 10.210.8.221:49154 - NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_ALREADY_ASSOCIATED
[2019/05/30 23:54:18.852637,  0, pid=8495] ../../source4/rpc_server/dcerpc_server.c:3221(add_socket_rpc_tcp_iface)
  service_setup_stream_socket(address=10.210.8.221,port=49154) for samr rpcecho wkssvc mgmt failed - NT_STATUS_ADDRESS_ALREADY_ASSOCIATEDtask_server_terminate: task_server_terminate: [dcerpc: Failed to initialise end points]
[2019/05/30 23:54:18.930989,  0, pid=8477] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:136(daemon_ready)
  daemon_ready: daemon 'samba' finished starting up and ready to serve connections
[2019/05/30 23:54:18.944930,  0, pid=8477] ../../source4/smbd/server.c:371(samba_terminate)
  samba_terminate: samba_terminate of samba 8477: dcerpc: Failed to initialise end points
[2019/05/30 23:54:25.238502,  0, pid=8694] ../../source4/smbd/server.c:587(binary_smbd_main)

half an our later it worked

[2019/05/31 00:24:27.718606,  0, pid=1323] ../../source4/smbd/server.c:587(binary_smbd_main)
  samba version 4.10.1-Univention started.
  Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2019

This broke the test because the the s4connector was unable to sync objects to samba (samba was not running) and therefor the join script 98univention-samba4-dns.inst failed (looking for spn account "dns-master091c" in local samba).
Comment 1 Felix Botner univentionstaff 2019-05-31 12:26:19 CEST
Created attachment 10050 [details]
log.samba
Comment 2 Felix Botner univentionstaff 2019-05-31 12:27:46 CEST
Created attachment 10051 [details]
autotest.log
Comment 3 Arvid Requate univentionstaff 2019-06-03 20:29:22 CEST
Looks like port 49154 was already occupied by a different process. The dynamic port range for samba is 49152-65535.
Comment 4 Christina Scheinig univentionstaff 2020-05-26 09:17:02 CEST
A customer now suggests he has the same issue in different customer environments.
Comment 5 Christina Scheinig univentionstaff 2020-05-26 15:49:32 CEST
I increased the "feeling level", because in two customer environments it happens at night. In the morning samba has to be started.
Comment 6 Christina Scheinig univentionstaff 2020-05-28 10:20:27 CEST
In the support case this seems to be an other issue. The error message is similar to this, but it is the normal 135 port.

I reset the flags!
Comment 7 Jan-Luca Kiok univentionstaff 2025-02-05 09:28:51 CET
This issue has been filed against UCS 4.4.

UCS 4.4 is out of maintenance and components may have vastly changed in later releases. Thus, this issue is now being closed.

If this issue still occurs in newer versions, please use "Clone this bug" or reopen this issue. In this case please provide information on how this issue is affecting you.