Bug 56872 – Properly display iso8601date in UMC Users/User module

Bug 56872 - Properly display iso8601date in UMC Users/User module


Summary:	Properly display iso8601date in UMC Users/User module

Status:	NEW

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	UMC - Users
Version:	UCS 5.0
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	UMC maintainers
QA Contact:	UMC maintainers

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2023-11-24 14:39 CET by Oliver Friedrich
Modified:	2023-11-27 16:42 CET (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	Bug Report
What type of bug is this?:	1: Cosmetic issue or missing function but workaround exists
Who will be affected by this bug?:	3: Will affect average number of installed domains
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	1: Nuisance – not a big deal but noticeable
User Pain:	0.017
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Example of a UMC user search with ucsschoolPurgeTimestamp displayed (46.52 KB, image/png) 2023-11-24 14:39 CET, Oliver Friedrich	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Oliver Friedrich

2023-11-24 14:39:34 CET

Created attachment 11152 [details]
Example of a UMC user search with ucsschoolPurgeTimestamp displayed

When I try to filter User according to their "ucscchoolPurgeTimestamp" (de: "geplantes Löschdatum") in the Users/User module, then I get a list of the PLAIN LDAP Timestamp (like 20231124000000Z) instead of a more human-friendly format (like 2023-11-24).

Also, the placeholder in the search dialogue, "1970-01-01", suggests this format.

If I do a UDM search via CLI, the format is displayed correctly (e.g. 2023-11-24).