Comment 1 Stefan Gohmann 2014-11-07 22:24:38 CET

Profil-based installation will be available later: Bug #35537

Comment 2 Stefan Gohmann 2014-11-14 11:21:57 CET

Several issues have been documented. Not all parts are translated yet.

http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.0/job/UCS-4.0-0/job/Release%20Notes/ws/webroot/release-notes-4.0-0-de.html

http://jenkins.knut.univention.de:8080/job/UCS-4.0/job/UCS-4.0-0/job/Release%20Notes/ws/webroot/release-notes-4.0-0-en.html

Comment 3 Alexander Kläser 2014-11-15 09:11:58 CET

I made some minor stylistic adaptations and copied the updated text for Piwik from the manual.

What I found confusing is the usage of MDB. I added the sentence that LDAP will not be updated automatically to MDB. But what is necessary to do in order to change the backend? Simply setting the UCR variable and resarting LDAP? This should be said somewhere.

The long lists of Bugs for the installer and the update to Debhelber9/Python 2.7 look IMHO way too long and thus too important. Not sure whether this can be changed easily, however, it's no real blocker.

Maybe the very detailed information from Bug 31907 should go into an SDB?

r55837.

Comment 4 Stefan Gohmann 2014-11-15 17:35:32 CET

(In reply to Alexander Kläser from comment #3)
> I made some minor stylistic adaptations and copied the updated text for
> Piwik from the manual.

OK

> What I found confusing is the usage of MDB. I added the sentence that LDAP
> will not be updated automatically to MDB. But what is necessary to do in
> order to change the backend? Simply setting the UCR variable and resarting
> LDAP? This should be said somewhere.

Yes, that's part of the performance guide. I added the reference to the performance guide in the changelog entry. But I removed your sentence from the highlights. The highlights should only give an overview, no instructions.

> The long lists of Bugs for the installer and the update to Debhelber9/Python
> 2.7 look IMHO way too long and thus too important. Not sure whether this can
> be changed easily, however, it's no real blocker.
> 
> Maybe the very detailed information from Bug 31907 should go into an SDB?

We are planning more changes in the password handling. Let's wait and see ...
 
> r55837.

OK, very good!

Comment 5 Stefan Gohmann 2014-11-15 17:37:08 CET

(In reply to Stefan Gohmann from comment #4)
> > What I found confusing is the usage of MDB. I added the sentence that LDAP
> > will not be updated automatically to MDB. But what is necessary to do in
> > order to change the backend? Simply setting the UCR variable and resarting
> > LDAP? This should be said somewhere.
> 
> Yes, that's part of the performance guide. I added the reference to the
> performance guide in the changelog entry. But I removed your sentence from
> the highlights. The highlights should only give an overview, no instructions.

r55844

Comment 6 Alexander Kläser 2014-11-17 13:09:33 CET

(In reply to Stefan Gohmann from comment #5)
> (In reply to Stefan Gohmann from comment #4)
> > > What I found confusing is the usage of MDB. I added the sentence that LDAP
> > > will not be updated automatically to MDB. But what is necessary to do in
> > > order to change the backend? Simply setting the UCR variable and resarting
> > > LDAP? This should be said somewhere.
> > 
> > Yes, that's part of the performance guide. I added the reference to the
> > performance guide in the changelog entry. But I removed your sentence from
> > the highlights. The highlights should only give an overview, no instructions.
> 
> r55844

OK.