Bug 41016 – "Required options/object classes" is misleading

Bug 41016 - "Required options/object classes" is misleading


Summary:	"Required options/object classes" is misleading

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 39201

Product:	UCS
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	UDM - Extended Attributes
Version:	UCS 4.1
Hardware:	Other Linux

Importance:	P5 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	UMC maintainers
QA Contact:

URL:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2016-04-07 08:32 CEST by Florian Best
Modified:	2018-04-13 13:29 CEST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?:	---
What type of bug is this?:	---
Who will be affected by this bug?:	---
How will those affected feel about the bug?:	---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional):	Cleanup, Typo/text changes
Max CVSS v3 score:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Florian Best

2016-04-07 08:32:04 CEST

An extended attribute has the property "Required options/object classes".
This is very misleading as one may assume that you actually can enter a LDAP object class as value while you are only able to enter UDM options there.

Can we change this so that it is possible to specify object classes there?
Otherwise the label should be changed.

I stumbled upon this now twice - it always costs time to debug this.

Comment 1 Philipp Hahn

2016-04-08 13:32:30 CEST


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 39201 ***