Bug 44513 - App appliance creation for UCS 4.2
App appliance creation for UCS 4.2
Product: UCS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: General
UCS 4.2
Other Linux
: P5 normal (vote)
: UCS 4.2-1-errata
Assigned To: Erik Damrose
Jürn Brodersen
Depends on: 43671 44575 44995
Blocks: 44952 44956
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2017-05-02 12:55 CEST by Erik Damrose
Modified: 2018-03-15 08:27 CET (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
What kind of report is it?: Feature Request
What type of bug is this?: ---
Who will be affected by this bug?: ---
How will those affected feel about the bug?: ---
User Pain:
Enterprise Customer affected?:
School Customer affected?:
ISV affected?:
Waiting Support:
Flags outvoted (downgraded) after PO Review:
Ticket number:
Bug group (optional): Appliance
Max CVSS v3 score:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Erik Damrose univentionstaff 2017-05-02 12:55:04 CEST
The appliance creation scripts have to be adapted to enable is to build UCS 4.2 app appliances
Comment 1 Erik Damrose univentionstaff 2017-05-02 13:19:39 CEST
r79004 update with latest scripts from 4.1-4, remove already merged "-beta" files
Comment 2 Erik Damrose univentionstaff 2017-05-02 15:28:59 CEST
r79006 merge utils/base-appliance.sh
r79007 Update config to ucs 4.2
Comment 3 Erik Damrose univentionstaff 2017-05-04 15:05:12 CEST
r79081 adjustments to univention-app-appliance
r79083 yaml
Comment 4 Erik Damrose univentionstaff 2017-05-04 18:19:11 CEST
r79094 Adapt ucs-kt-instance-create to support downloading images
ucs-kvm-testenv 1.2.49-7.81.201705041818
Comment 5 Erik Damrose univentionstaff 2017-07-06 16:31:33 CEST
As discussed, a part of the QA can start from my perspective - checking if installation is possible with the kopano-core appliance in different system roles and into AD
Comment 6 Jürn Brodersen univentionstaff 2017-07-13 17:20:40 CEST
If I try to join the appliance as a backup the package univention-fetchmail-schema gets installed on the backup before the join starts and breaks slapd.conf.

The join fails.
Comment 7 Erik Damrose univentionstaff 2017-07-26 11:47:29 CEST
several revision before this one...
r81378 create all appliance variants; reactivated vmware + esxi creation

fixed for now. All appliance types can be created. For follow up issues, new bugs will be created
Comment 8 Jürn Brodersen univentionstaff 2017-08-01 10:46:21 CEST
I noticed some small thinks:
The AD-join is deactivated for kopano. Is that intended?
The owncloud appliance can only join as a backup. Joining as a slave does not install the app?
The English owncloud first steps help still has some html in it.

Already discussed:
The kopano appliance can't join a domain because of the fetch mail package.
The owncloud appliance has no fast demo mode.

What I tested:
Installed appliances as a master and checked basic app functionality.
Installed owncloud as an AD member and checked basic app functionality.
Installed owncload as a backup and checked basic app functionality.

I joined a backup into a kopano appliance which was installed as master. I then tried to upgrade that backup to a master which was a bit cumbersome because of the special master packages from kopano. But I guess that doesn't happen very often and isn't really an appliance problem.
Comment 9 Jürn Brodersen univentionstaff 2017-08-02 11:58:45 CEST
(In reply to Jürn Brodersen from comment #8)

> The owncloud appliance can only join as a backup. Joining as a slave does
> not install the app?

Waiting for activation of the extension object owncloud:....................................................ERROR: Master did not mark the extension object active within 180 seconds.
Registering schema file /usr/share/univention-appcenter/apps/owncloud/owncloud.schema failed
Going to remove ownCloud (10.0.1-20170523)

It seems adding the ldap extension during the join is the problem here. I can install the app, after the join is complete, without problems and I can't find any errors on the master that the extension failed. Maybe it really is a timeout issue because the master is to busy with the join?
Comment 10 Stefan Gohmann univentionstaff 2018-03-15 08:27:04 CET
Already released.