Univention Bugzilla – Bug 42789
Add tab for advanced settings
Last modified: 2017-11-16 14:25:51 CET
We will need a tab for handling further advanced settings. Herein, it will be also possible to define free key-value pairs that are currently not considered in the layout.
First version is done. Missing fields are: * CSP / cloud logo * Resource requirements (these are not transmitted to the frontend) * Custom entries (we need a list of INI fields which need to be displayed) univention-management-console-module-appcenter-selfservice (1.0.0-40): r73921 | Bug #42789: add basic structure for the advanced settings tab
(In reply to Alexander Kläser from comment #1) > * Resource requirements (these are not transmitted to the frontend) Done. univention-management-console-module-appcenter-selfservice (1.0.0-61): r74220 | Bug #42789: Added resources requirements
Raw INI values are returned via the kez '_ini_vars' [r74470].
(In reply to Alexander Kläser from comment #3) > Raw INI values are returned via the kez '_ini_vars' [r74470]. INI values → should be "INI keys"
(In reply to Alexander Kläser from comment #1) > [...] > * CSP / cloud logo This is handled via the META file via Bug 42800. > [...] > * Custom entries (we need a list of INI fields which need to be displayed) Done. univention-management-console-module-appcenter-selfservice (1.0.0-98): r74494 | Bug #42789: allow custom entries which are not forseen in the layout
univention-management-console-module-appcenter-selfservice (1.0.0-100): r74499 | Bug #42789: ignore particular custom entries + minor layout adjustments
(In reply to Alexander Kläser from comment #5) > > [...] > > * Custom entries (we need a list of INI fields which need to be displayed) > > Done. You cannot easily unset a custom entry. The frontend needs send {'mycustomkey': ''} if that custom entry was deleted via the [-] button.
(In reply to Dirk Wiesenthal from comment #7) > You cannot easily unset a custom entry. The frontend needs send > {'mycustomkey': ''} if that custom entry was deleted via the [-] button. I created Bug 43327 for that in order to better track this behaviour.
I guess this will not be reopened